Improper material selection will cause fastener rust, fatigue fracture and cost waste. Carbon steel and stainless steel fasteners have different mechanical and anti-corrosion properties, which cannot be replaced arbitrarily. This article attaches a complete parameter comparison table to standardize material selection for all industrial scenarios.
| Material Type | Anti-Rust Level | Max Strength Grade | Thread Seizure Risk | Magnetic Property | Cost Level | Core Feature |
| Galvanized Carbon Steel | Low | 12.9 Grade | Very Low | Magnetic | Lowest | High strength, poor outdoor rust resistance |
| 201 Stainless Steel | Medium Low | 5.8 Grade | Medium | Weak Magnetic | Low | Indoor use only, poor salt resistance |
| 304 Stainless Steel | High | 8.8 Grade | High | Slight Magnetic | Medium | General anti-corrosion, common outdoor part |
| 316 Stainless Steel | Highest | 8.8 Grade | Very High | Non-magnetic Optional | High | Acid and salt corrosion resistance |
Choose galvanized carbon steel for dry indoor frames, 304 for urban outdoor equipment, 316 for coastal and chemical devices, high-strength carbon steel for heavy-load vibration equipment.
Carbon steel threads are wear-resistant and reusable. Stainless steel fasteners need anti-seize grease during locking to avoid thread galling. Do not exceed standard torque when fastening stainless steel products.